Connect with us

Brexit

Who is David Davis? Brexit chief under fire over economic impact assessments and Conservative MP for Haltemprice and Howden

BREXIT Secretary David Davis is one of Theresa May’s most parliamentary allies and an ardent Brexiteer Mr Davis has twice competed for the Tory leadership and the Haltemprice and Howden MP returned to the cabinet last year after almost a decade on the backbenches to spearhead the PM’s negotiations with the EU. Who is David […]

Published

on

BREXIT Secretary David Davis is one of Theresa May’s most parliamentary allies and an ardent Brexiteer

Mr Davis has twice competed for the Tory leadership and the Haltemprice and Howden MP returned to the cabinet last year after almost a decade on the backbenches to spearhead the PM’s negotiations with the EU.

David Davis is being tipped by some as the next Prime Minister
Getty Images

Who is David Davis and what does his CV look like?

Mr Davis, 68, was born in York to a single mother and was initially brought up by his grandparents.

When his mother re-married the family moved to south London, living in a deprived part of Wandsworth before moving to a council estate in Tooting.

He completed a BSc in computer science at Warwick University before studying a London Business School and Harvard.

Aged 38, he was first elected to parliament in 1987 as MP for Boothferry – which later became his current constituency Haltemprice and Howden.

In 1992, he was a government whip who worked on pushing through the Maastricht treaty, which led to the euro and greater integration of the European Union.

He twice stood for Conservative party leader in 2001 and 2005 but was beaten to the post by Iain Duncan Smith then David Cameron.

His poor performance at the Conservative party conference was said to have cost him the second leadership bid and he and Cameron never got along as the Tories rose to power.

Mr Davis triggered a by-election in 2008 following a row over civil liberties after new terror laws were passed allowing suspects to be detained without charge for 42 days.

Despite getting re-elected he was sidelined for nearly a decade on the backbenches before returning to the cabinet in 2016 after Theresa May took office.

Has David Davis prepared economic assessments for Brexit?

David Davis told the Brexit select committee on November 6 that formal impact assessments which attempt to put a number on the economic effects of quitting the EU have never been compiled.

Explaining why the department has not tried to do a formal assessment of Brexit, Mr Davis told MPs: “You don’t need to do a formal impact assessment to understand that if there is a regulatory hurdle between your producers and a market, there will be an impact.

Pro-EU MPs reacted with anger to the Brexit Secretary’s admission that there are no impact assessments available.

Labour’s Wes Streeting wrote on Twitter: “This is totally disgraceful. Biggest issue facing our country since the Second World War and this is the state of government preparedness.”

David Lammy blasted the minister, saying: “He must surely now resign. He simply can not be allowed to go around lying to Parliament and the British public in this way.”

What are David Davis’ views and has he ever faced controversy?

Mr Davis has been outspoken on a number of issues and in 2003 when he voiced his support of the death penalty for people convicted of murder “where there is clear evidence and no doubt” surrounding the offender’s guilt.

Five years later he distanced himself from the comments and said he did not want to restore the death penalty, but in a personal capacity agrees with the principal.

In 2005, he was bizarrely forced to deny he was behind a stunt involving two blonde women with large breasts wearing “It’s DD for me” t-shirts during his party leadership bid.

But he did add that he felt people had a “sense of humour failure” over the issue.

Earlier this year, he was slammed over leaked texts in which he said he would not hug Labour MP Diane Abbott because he is “not blind”.

He apologised for any offence caused by the messages.

How did he find himself in charge of Brexit and what does he say about it?

David Davis spent nearly a decade on the backbenches before being appointed Brexit Secretary
PA:Press Association

Mr Davis was a high-profile Leave supporter and campaigner in the run-up to the EU referendum.

He was asked to rejoin the cabinet as Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.

Downing Street sources say he won the trust of Mrs May and was seen as a safer pair of hands than other outspoken Leavers such as Boris Johnson and Liam Fox.

He appears to have taken care not to talk out of line or become embroiled in public rows with colleagues over how Brexit will unfold.

Laying out his Brexit plans, Mr Davis claimed the economy would feel the benefits even before Britain’s departure because of increased foreign investment.

He said: “Brexit will deliver the circumstances that allow us to pursue an unfettered high growth strategy.”

Mr Davis has urged business chiefs to stay with Britain following fears some companies may be tempted to move staff or manufacturing to other European countries.

Does David Davis want to become Prime Minister and who is supporting him?

The Brexit Secretary has emerged as a favourite to replace Theresa May – following a survey of Tory members.

A study by academics published in July found more than a fifth, 21 per cent of Conservatives want the Brexit Secretary to take over from the ailing PM.

Mr Davis has also previously played down the chances of a leadership challenge during Brexit negotiations.

Theresa May was left vulnerable after her snap election gamble backfired
Getty Images

He said in June: “Let me be absolutely plain about this, number one I happen to think we have got a very good Prime Minister.

“There is no essay crisis about this government. It is very, very, very clear that she is a good Prime Minister.”

 

Continue Reading

Brexit

Theresa May’s EU compromise is ‘not ideal’ says Iain Duncan Smith but key Brexiteer claims Brussels budged too – and it now opens door for a trade deal

THERESA May’s EU compromise is “not ideal”, according to Iain Duncan Smith but the key Brexiteer claims Brussels has budged too and it opens door to the UK getting a trade deal. The former Tory leader gave a cautious welcome to the agreement the Prime Minister signed with Jean-Claude Juncker on Friday, saying “I’m not […]

Published

on

THERESA May’s EU compromise is “not ideal”, according to Iain Duncan Smith but the key Brexiteer claims Brussels has budged too and it opens door to the UK getting a trade deal.

The former Tory leader gave a cautious welcome to the agreement the Prime Minister signed with Jean-Claude Juncker on Friday, saying “I’m not ecstatic”.

Theresa May’s EU compromise is ‘not ideal’ says Iain Duncan Smith
PA

It comes as Mrs May prepares to update MPs on the progress of the talks, where he is set to take an upbeat stance on securing a Brexit deal.

But Ireland insists the UK must stick to its commitments on keeping a soft border with the Republic, after David Davis caused a row by suggesting the plans hammered out last week were only a “statement of intent”.

He appeared to row back on those words, branded “bizarre” by the Dublin government, in an interview with LBC this morning.

In a u-turn he said the UK’s commitment to the Irish border as “much more than legally enforceable”.

But the key Brexiteer claims Brussels budged too and it opens the door for a future trade deal
Getty

The PM has to now convince the Brexiteers in her Cabinet about the details of the draft agreement when she assembles her top team for a meeting in Downing Street this morning.

But one of the key anti-EU Tory backbenchers is supportive of the deal, which should allow the other EU leaders to agree “sufficient progress” has been made to move on to trade and transition talks at Thursday’s crunch summit.

Mr Duncan Smith, writing in the Telegraph, said: “The draft agreement reached by Theresa May does not make me jubilant, but nor do I feel betrayed.

“The EU has budged on several crucial points, and the way is now open to discuss a proper free-trade agreement that the British people voted for.”

It comes as Mrs May prepares to update MPs on the progress of the talks, where he is set to take an upbeat stance on securing a Brexit deal
PA

He attacked the draft agreement released last Monday, which was scuppered by the DUP, saying it was “left open the possibility that Northern Ireland might have a separate position to the rest of the UK, which was unacceptable”.

He also said on “regulatory alignment” it left open the possibility the EU would try to exploit its “vague language to keep us inside the single market and customs union in all but name”.

The ex-Cabinet Minister said the new wording helped correct this, but added: “Most importantly, though, all this can be torn up tomorrow, because ‘nothing is agreed until everything is agreed’.”

And trying to calm those who are unhappy with the deal, he went on: “Some Leavers are crying betrayal and believe they have been sold out. I think that is incorrect.”

Speaking in the Commons on the proposed first phase text Mrs May is expected to say ‘this is not about a hard or a soft Brexit’
PA

He added: “While this agreement is not ideal, it doesn’t stop us from taking tough lines where we need to.

“It simply gets us through the first round, and I believe it has left us in a better position than we were last Monday, for it has opened the door to a deal.”

Speaking in the Commons on the proposed first phase text Mrs May is expected to say: “This is not about a hard or a soft Brexit.

“The arrangements we have agreed to reach the second phase of the talks are entirely consistent with the principles and objectives that I set out in my speeches in Florence and at Lancaster House.”

And she will tell MPs: “There is, I believe, a new sense of optimism now in the talks and I fully hope and expect that we will confirm the arrangements I have set out today in the European Council later this week.

“In doing so we can move on to building the bold new economic and security relationships that can underpin the new deep and special partnership we all want to see.

“A partnership between the European Union and a sovereign United Kingdom that has taken control of its borders, money and laws once again.

A partnership that is in the best interests of the whole United Kingdom.  And a partnership which can deliver prosperity and security for all our people, for generations to come.”

Continue Reading

Brexit

David Davis U-turns over Irish border deal and says it IS legally binding after sparking fresh Brexit rift

DAVID Davis has been forced to row back on claims that Britain’s promises on Ireland were not legally enforcable”. The Brexit Secretary today stressed Britain’s commitment to a frictionless Irish border – even if we don’t get a deal with the EU. The Brexit Secretary risked fury with Ireland yesterday after he said last week’s […]

Published

on

DAVID Davis has been forced to row back on claims that Britain’s promises on Ireland were not legally enforcable”.

The Brexit Secretary today stressed Britain’s commitment to a frictionless Irish border – even if we don’t get a deal with the EU.

David Davis has rowed back on his comments about the Northern Ireland border

The Brexit Secretary risked fury with Ireland yesterday after he said last week’s tightly-fought deal was just a “statement of intent” and would not be signed off if there was no deal with the bloc.

A key section of Theresa May’s “phase one” divorce agreement with the EU vowed to align the UK with EU rules in Ireland to prevent a ‘Hard Border’ between the North and Republic.

The Irish Government branded his statement “bizarre” and insisted they would hold the UK “to account” on it.

But the Brexit Secretary told LBC Radio today that his words had been “twisted” and he was misquoted.

Mr Davis said that last week’s agreement with the EU was ‘more than legally enforceable’
Reuters

Mr Davis said: “We want to protect the peace process, want to protect Ireland from the impact of Brexit for them, and I said this was a statement of intent which was much more than just legally enforceable.”

He went on: “Even if that didn’t happen for some reason, if something went wrong, we would still be seeking to provide a frictionless invisible border with Ireland.

“The bit about the full alignment argument on the issues which affect the peace process in the Belfast Agreement, we would look to that anyway because one of our absolute underpinning aims is to ensure that Ireland and particularly the Northern Ireland peace process is not harmed.”

Irish Prime Minister Leo Varadkar said he was “delighted” to hear that the Brexit Secretary had “clarified” his remarks.

But a European Commission spokesperson added this morning that the “joint report is not legally binding”, but it was seen as a “gentleman’s agreement” that both sides shook hands on.

Mr Davis stressed a hard border would be avoided even with no deal.

But he admitted that negotiations with the EU had been “testy” the past few months.

Northern Ireland Secretary James Brokenshire also doubled down on his reassurances this morning.

He said today that “no one should be in any doubt at all as to our commitment to following this through”.

Theresa May and David Davis lastweek met with EU chiefs to agree a deal to progress with Brexit
PA:Press Association

Theresa May secured agreement with the EU to finally move on to trade talks last Friday, after working through the night and flying out to Brussels to seal the deal.

It was almost held up over the thorny issue of the Northern Ireland border – but overcame issues by agreeing to “allign” rules with the EU.

The small print and exact way the border will be worked out will be the subject of future talks.

Later this week the EU27 will meet to formally agree whether they are happy to move on to talking trade.

David Davis claims he doesn't need to be clever to do his job

DAVID Davis doesn't have to be clever or know much to be Brexit Secretary, all he has to do is try and stay calm.

The Cabinet minister made the extraordinary admission in an interview with LBC this morning.

He said that “anybody” could do his job too.

Mr Davis said: “What’s the requirement of my job? I don’t have to be very clever or know that much. I just have to be calm.”

And he said that he was probably “shackled” to his job until the end of the Brexit process unless he’s booted out.

He said: “I suspect I am shackled to the mast, unless they decide I am not very good at it in which case they’ll sack me.

“Anybody can do details. I’ll let you do the details.”

He also used the interview to say that he didn’t believe economic forecasts because they had “all been proved wrong”.

And he refused to blame our vote to leave the EU for inflation rises.

“These things bounce around, you can’t attribute it to Brexit,” he stressed.

EU officials said after progress was made on the border, citizens rights and our divorce bill, they are happy to recommend we start talking about a future deal.

Today Mrs May will try to sell the deal to her sceptical backbenchers – who are concerned about how much we’re going to have to pay to leave.

She will bid to unite her feuding cabinet too over Brexit as she declares a “new sense of optimism” about the EU talks.

Continue Reading

Brexit

We are over the first Brexit hurdle… now we want free trade with the EU

BRITAIN has cleared the first major hurdle towards striking a Brexit deal – despite all  the pessimists warning of impending doom. It’s not a perfect outcome and won’t please everyone 100 per cent. But now we have made progress on the Irish border, the size of the divorce bill and EU citizens’ rights, we can […]

Published

on

BRITAIN has cleared the first major hurdle towards striking a Brexit deal – despite all  the pessimists warning of impending doom.

It’s not a perfect outcome and won’t please everyone 100 per cent.

Britain may have cleared the first hurdle but there is still plenty of work ahead

But now we have made progress on the Irish border, the size of the divorce bill and EU citizens’ rights, we can start discussing the more important issues of trade and future relations.

Before we do though, we really must learn to stop going into meltdown every time these talks run into the buffers.

It is certain to happen again as we move into the more difficult stages but as we learned this week, when things go wrong, you go home, sleep on it and move forward.

As we go into these negotiations one idea must remain at the forefront of our minds — whatever deal we get with the EU will not be as important as the decisions we make once we have left.

Contrary to some of the shouty nonsense we heard from both sides of the referendum campaign, leaving the EU will guarantee neither failure nor success.

When a young adult sets off from his parents’ home, the act of leaving is only the first step.

It is a daunting time, with many risks and much uncertainty, but it is what that person does with their new-found freedom that really counts.

The same will be true of Britain’s future outside the EU.

Reuters
Theresa May and Jean-Claude Junker shake hands at EC headquarters[/caption]

Over the coming weeks we will learn how much Europe’s elite want to maintain their current trading relationship with us.

Three issues will dominate discussions:

FIRST, what degree of freedom will we have in the way we regulate our economy?

SECOND, to what extent will we be able to determine our own tariff regime and strike trade deals with other nations?

And THIRD, what control will we have over our borders?

We will have to make compromises in all three areas.

But before that, we need a clear understanding of what we want to achieve.

No such vision has yet emerged from the UK Government.

AFP - Getty
Whatever deal we get with the EU will not be as important as the decisions we make once we have left[/caption]

The process of national debate is beneficial and important. But there comes a moment when leadership is needed.

The Government must now set out its aspirations for our future outside the EU.

Regulation and red tape is likely to be the first battleground.

Some people argue we should aim to be like Norway. It almost completely aligns its regulations with the EU to get the best possible access to its markets.

But Norway must take rules from Brussels without a say in how they are shaped.

As a result, it is burdened with 93 of the 100 costliest EU regulations.

Such arrangements impose costs on an economy and restrict its freedom to strike trade deals outside the EU.

For me, it comes down to who will make the laws that govern our country. I am sure we will choose to implement many of Europe’s regulations going ­forward, but that choice must be ours.

All new regulation involves choices between competing interests. Our interests in remaining aligned to the EU will be one important consideration, but only one.

There are other competing interests — importers, exporters, producers, consumers, the environment and the economy — and deciding between them will be hard.

But the choice must be made here, taking account of Britain’s unique circumstances.

Rules in the EU are designed on a one-size-fits-all basis.

They are a compromise between 28 countries, not tailored for each country’s specific situation.

Rules to protect newts might make sense in parts of Europe where they are endangered, but not in the UK, where builders find them in abundance.

As a result of this and other inappropriate regulation, the EU’s Habitats Directive makes it harder and more expensive to build the houses we ­desperately need.

To accept the idea of independent regulation we need to eliminate one pervasive and muddled myth.

PA:Press Association
Simon Wolfson is a Conservative life peer and chairman of pro-Brexit think tank Open Europe[/caption]

Many believe that unless we are bound by European regulation, Britain will be unable to trade with Europe.

I work for a company that imports products from inside and outside the EU and sells them into 70 different countries across the globe.

So I know an exporter does not need to impose the EU’s rules in its own markets to export to the EU.

Individual companies can still make their products comply with overseas regulations.

How else does China, India and the US manage to do so much business with Europe?

Failure to agree equivalent regulation may increase the administration of crossing borders but will not prevent UK companies trading with Europe.

The Government has already sensibly said it will not rip up the EU rule book as we leave.

And of course we will keep many rules that help secure a deal and a soft border with Ireland.

But we should not bind ourselves, for the rest of time, to abide by unknown future rules over which we have no control.

For this reason, a Norway-style arrangement will not work for the UK, nor is it the only available model.

In my mind the vision is clear — we should aim to trade fairly and freely with Europe and, if possible, we want them to have the same privileged access to our markets that they currently enjoy and we would like the same in return.

But the price of that access cannot be to surrender the freedom we have over our future regulation, tariff rates and trade deals.

Canada’s trade deal with Europe provides an excellent starting point for such an agreement and a launch pad for a healthy, peaceful and prosperous ­relationship with the EU.

It should be the starting point for our negotiations with the EU.

  • Simon Wolfson is a Conservative life peer and chairman of pro-Brexit think tank Open Europe.
Continue Reading

Trending