PREPARE for the barrage of hand-wringing outrage over the probable drone killing of terrorist Sally Jones. We will not join in.
It will be terrible if her young son has died with her, as is feared.
Terrorist Sally Jones has been killed by a drone, says the CIA[/caption]
But the fault will lie entirely with Jones. She took JoJo from his safe life here, exposed him to appalling danger, brainwashed him, allegedly let him be turned into a child executioner and routinely used him as a human shield.
Every day, she remained a threat to innocent lives in Britain and America.
Arrest, in that hellish war zone, is not an option. Jones had to be taken out.
It will be terrible if her young son, Joe, had also died, as is feared[/caption]
The Tories need to understand what a six-week delay in a payment means to someone with literally no money[/caption]
THERESA May needs to fix Universal Credit fast.
We back this system. It is much simpler than a bewildering array of handouts. And it incentivises work over dole.
But the Tories need to understand what a six-week delay in a payment means to someone with literally no money: hunger, eviction, food banks and loan sharks.
The Government must ensure every claimant can get cash within a day or two of switching to the new benefit.
And it must end the scandalous 55p-a-minute charge for the Universal Credit helpline. Who thought it a good idea to fleece our poorest as they call for help?
The idea behind Universal Credit is admirable. The execution, so far, is not.
Be ready, Phil
Philip Hammond doesn’t want to spend a penny he doesn’t have to[/caption]
FIRST the Chancellor says there’s no need yet to commit money to preparing for a “no deal” Brexit. Then he says it could ground all planes to and from the EU.
That strikes us as a disaster we should plan for now.
Theresa May was right to order him to free up funds. One sure way to focus EU minds on making a deal is being fully ready to walk away without one.
Philip Hammond doesn’t want to spend a penny he doesn’t have to. OK.
But he would be grossly negligent to leave it too late to prepare for the worst.
FOR proof Turkey has descended into dictatorship, consider its monstrous suppression of free speech and the jailing of journalists.
Ayla Albayrak of the Wall Street Journal quoted a Kurdish fighter in a balanced story about the ongoing civil war.
She got more than two years’ prison for “spreading propaganda”, joining 180 or so reporters similarly accused.
The world should, as one, condemn President Erdogan.
It is still incredible David Cameron and others lobbied for Turkey to join the EU.
MOST READ IN OPINION
Theresa May’s EU compromise is ‘not ideal’ says Iain Duncan Smith but key Brexiteer claims Brussels budged too – and it now opens door for a trade deal
THERESA May’s EU compromise is “not ideal”, according to Iain Duncan Smith but the key Brexiteer claims Brussels has budged too and it opens door to the UK getting a trade deal. The former Tory leader gave a cautious welcome to the agreement the Prime Minister signed with Jean-Claude Juncker on Friday, saying “I’m not […]
THERESA May’s EU compromise is “not ideal”, according to Iain Duncan Smith but the key Brexiteer claims Brussels has budged too and it opens door to the UK getting a trade deal.
The former Tory leader gave a cautious welcome to the agreement the Prime Minister signed with Jean-Claude Juncker on Friday, saying “I’m not ecstatic”.
It comes as Mrs May prepares to update MPs on the progress of the talks, where he is set to take an upbeat stance on securing a Brexit deal.
But Ireland insists the UK must stick to its commitments on keeping a soft border with the Republic, after David Davis caused a row by suggesting the plans hammered out last week were only a “statement of intent”.
He appeared to row back on those words, branded “bizarre” by the Dublin government, in an interview with LBC this morning.
In a u-turn he said the UK’s commitment to the Irish border as “much more than legally enforceable”.
The PM has to now convince the Brexiteers in her Cabinet about the details of the draft agreement when she assembles her top team for a meeting in Downing Street this morning.
But one of the key anti-EU Tory backbenchers is supportive of the deal, which should allow the other EU leaders to agree “sufficient progress” has been made to move on to trade and transition talks at Thursday’s crunch summit.
Mr Duncan Smith, writing in the Telegraph, said: “The draft agreement reached by Theresa May does not make me jubilant, but nor do I feel betrayed.
“The EU has budged on several crucial points, and the way is now open to discuss a proper free-trade agreement that the British people voted for.”
He attacked the draft agreement released last Monday, which was scuppered by the DUP, saying it was “left open the possibility that Northern Ireland might have a separate position to the rest of the UK, which was unacceptable”.
He also said on “regulatory alignment” it left open the possibility the EU would try to exploit its “vague language to keep us inside the single market and customs union in all but name”.
The ex-Cabinet Minister said the new wording helped correct this, but added: “Most importantly, though, all this can be torn up tomorrow, because ‘nothing is agreed until everything is agreed’.”
And trying to calm those who are unhappy with the deal, he went on: “Some Leavers are crying betrayal and believe they have been sold out. I think that is incorrect.”
He added: “While this agreement is not ideal, it doesn’t stop us from taking tough lines where we need to.
“It simply gets us through the first round, and I believe it has left us in a better position than we were last Monday, for it has opened the door to a deal.”
Speaking in the Commons on the proposed first phase text Mrs May is expected to say: “This is not about a hard or a soft Brexit.
“The arrangements we have agreed to reach the second phase of the talks are entirely consistent with the principles and objectives that I set out in my speeches in Florence and at Lancaster House.”
MOST READ IN POLITICS:
And she will tell MPs: “There is, I believe, a new sense of optimism now in the talks and I fully hope and expect that we will confirm the arrangements I have set out today in the European Council later this week.
“In doing so we can move on to building the bold new economic and security relationships that can underpin the new deep and special partnership we all want to see.
“A partnership between the European Union and a sovereign United Kingdom that has taken control of its borders, money and laws once again.
A partnership that is in the best interests of the whole United Kingdom. And a partnership which can deliver prosperity and security for all our people, for generations to come.”
David Davis U-turns over Irish border deal and says it IS legally binding after sparking fresh Brexit rift
DAVID Davis has been forced to row back on claims that Britain’s promises on Ireland were not legally enforcable”. The Brexit Secretary today stressed Britain’s commitment to a frictionless Irish border – even if we don’t get a deal with the EU. The Brexit Secretary risked fury with Ireland yesterday after he said last week’s […]
DAVID Davis has been forced to row back on claims that Britain’s promises on Ireland were not legally enforcable”.
The Brexit Secretary today stressed Britain’s commitment to a frictionless Irish border – even if we don’t get a deal with the EU.
The Brexit Secretary risked fury with Ireland yesterday after he said last week’s tightly-fought deal was just a “statement of intent” and would not be signed off if there was no deal with the bloc.
The Irish Government branded his statement “bizarre” and insisted they would hold the UK “to account” on it.
But the Brexit Secretary told LBC Radio today that his words had been “twisted” and he was misquoted.
Mr Davis said: “We want to protect the peace process, want to protect Ireland from the impact of Brexit for them, and I said this was a statement of intent which was much more than just legally enforceable.”
He went on: “Even if that didn’t happen for some reason, if something went wrong, we would still be seeking to provide a frictionless invisible border with Ireland.
“The bit about the full alignment argument on the issues which affect the peace process in the Belfast Agreement, we would look to that anyway because one of our absolute underpinning aims is to ensure that Ireland and particularly the Northern Ireland peace process is not harmed.”
Irish Prime Minister Leo Varadkar said he was “delighted” to hear that the Brexit Secretary had “clarified” his remarks.
But a European Commission spokesperson added this morning that the “joint report is not legally binding”, but it was seen as a “gentleman’s agreement” that both sides shook hands on.
Mr Davis stressed a hard border would be avoided even with no deal.
But he admitted that negotiations with the EU had been “testy” the past few months.
Northern Ireland Secretary James Brokenshire also doubled down on his reassurances this morning.
He said today that “no one should be in any doubt at all as to our commitment to following this through”.
Theresa May secured agreement with the EU to finally move on to trade talks last Friday, after working through the night and flying out to Brussels to seal the deal.
It was almost held up over the thorny issue of the Northern Ireland border – but overcame issues by agreeing to “allign” rules with the EU.
The small print and exact way the border will be worked out will be the subject of future talks.
Later this week the EU27 will meet to formally agree whether they are happy to move on to talking trade.
David Davis claims he doesn't need to be clever to do his job
DAVID Davis doesn't have to be clever or know much to be Brexit Secretary, all he has to do is try and stay calm.
The Cabinet minister made the extraordinary admission in an interview with LBC this morning.
He said that “anybody” could do his job too.
Mr Davis said: “What’s the requirement of my job? I don’t have to be very clever or know that much. I just have to be calm.”
And he said that he was probably “shackled” to his job until the end of the Brexit process unless he’s booted out.
He said: “I suspect I am shackled to the mast, unless they decide I am not very good at it in which case they’ll sack me.
“Anybody can do details. I’ll let you do the details.”
He also used the interview to say that he didn’t believe economic forecasts because they had “all been proved wrong”.
And he refused to blame our vote to leave the EU for inflation rises.
“These things bounce around, you can’t attribute it to Brexit,” he stressed.
MOST READ IN POLITICS
EU officials said after progress was made on the border, citizens rights and our divorce bill, they are happy to recommend we start talking about a future deal.
Today Mrs May will try to sell the deal to her sceptical backbenchers – who are concerned about how much we’re going to have to pay to leave.
She will bid to unite her feuding cabinet too over Brexit as she declares a “new sense of optimism” about the EU talks.
We are over the first Brexit hurdle… now we want free trade with the EU
BRITAIN has cleared the first major hurdle towards striking a Brexit deal – despite all the pessimists warning of impending doom. It’s not a perfect outcome and won’t please everyone 100 per cent. But now we have made progress on the Irish border, the size of the divorce bill and EU citizens’ rights, we can […]
BRITAIN has cleared the first major hurdle towards striking a Brexit deal – despite all the pessimists warning of impending doom.
It’s not a perfect outcome and won’t please everyone 100 per cent.
But now we have made progress on the Irish border, the size of the divorce bill and EU citizens’ rights, we can start discussing the more important issues of trade and future relations.
Before we do though, we really must learn to stop going into meltdown every time these talks run into the buffers.
It is certain to happen again as we move into the more difficult stages but as we learned this week, when things go wrong, you go home, sleep on it and move forward.
As we go into these negotiations one idea must remain at the forefront of our minds — whatever deal we get with the EU will not be as important as the decisions we make once we have left.
Contrary to some of the shouty nonsense we heard from both sides of the referendum campaign, leaving the EU will guarantee neither failure nor success.
When a young adult sets off from his parents’ home, the act of leaving is only the first step.
It is a daunting time, with many risks and much uncertainty, but it is what that person does with their new-found freedom that really counts.
The same will be true of Britain’s future outside the EU.
Theresa May and Jean-Claude Junker shake hands at EC headquarters[/caption]
Over the coming weeks we will learn how much Europe’s elite want to maintain their current trading relationship with us.
Three issues will dominate discussions:
FIRST, what degree of freedom will we have in the way we regulate our economy?
SECOND, to what extent will we be able to determine our own tariff regime and strike trade deals with other nations?
And THIRD, what control will we have over our borders?
We will have to make compromises in all three areas.
But before that, we need a clear understanding of what we want to achieve.
No such vision has yet emerged from the UK Government.
Whatever deal we get with the EU will not be as important as the decisions we make once we have left[/caption]
The process of national debate is beneficial and important. But there comes a moment when leadership is needed.
The Government must now set out its aspirations for our future outside the EU.
Regulation and red tape is likely to be the first battleground.
Some people argue we should aim to be like Norway. It almost completely aligns its regulations with the EU to get the best possible access to its markets.
But Norway must take rules from Brussels without a say in how they are shaped.
As a result, it is burdened with 93 of the 100 costliest EU regulations.
Such arrangements impose costs on an economy and restrict its freedom to strike trade deals outside the EU.
For me, it comes down to who will make the laws that govern our country. I am sure we will choose to implement many of Europe’s regulations going forward, but that choice must be ours.
All new regulation involves choices between competing interests. Our interests in remaining aligned to the EU will be one important consideration, but only one.
There are other competing interests — importers, exporters, producers, consumers, the environment and the economy — and deciding between them will be hard.
But the choice must be made here, taking account of Britain’s unique circumstances.
Rules in the EU are designed on a one-size-fits-all basis.
They are a compromise between 28 countries, not tailored for each country’s specific situation.
Rules to protect newts might make sense in parts of Europe where they are endangered, but not in the UK, where builders find them in abundance.
As a result of this and other inappropriate regulation, the EU’s Habitats Directive makes it harder and more expensive to build the houses we desperately need.
To accept the idea of independent regulation we need to eliminate one pervasive and muddled myth.
Simon Wolfson is a Conservative life peer and chairman of pro-Brexit think tank Open Europe[/caption]
Many believe that unless we are bound by European regulation, Britain will be unable to trade with Europe.
I work for a company that imports products from inside and outside the EU and sells them into 70 different countries across the globe.
So I know an exporter does not need to impose the EU’s rules in its own markets to export to the EU.
Individual companies can still make their products comply with overseas regulations.
How else does China, India and the US manage to do so much business with Europe?
Failure to agree equivalent regulation may increase the administration of crossing borders but will not prevent UK companies trading with Europe.
The Government has already sensibly said it will not rip up the EU rule book as we leave.
And of course we will keep many rules that help secure a deal and a soft border with Ireland.
But we should not bind ourselves, for the rest of time, to abide by unknown future rules over which we have no control.
For this reason, a Norway-style arrangement will not work for the UK, nor is it the only available model.
In my mind the vision is clear — we should aim to trade fairly and freely with Europe and, if possible, we want them to have the same privileged access to our markets that they currently enjoy and we would like the same in return.
MOST READ IN OPINION
But the price of that access cannot be to surrender the freedom we have over our future regulation, tariff rates and trade deals.
Canada’s trade deal with Europe provides an excellent starting point for such an agreement and a launch pad for a healthy, peaceful and prosperous relationship with the EU.
It should be the starting point for our negotiations with the EU.
- Simon Wolfson is a Conservative life peer and chairman of pro-Brexit think tank Open Europe.
Bizarre2 months ago
Bromans star Brandon Myers challenges Love Island’s Chris Hughes to penis competition saying his nine-and-a-half member is bigger
Celebrity1 month ago
Lucy Pinder looks gorgeous in pictures from her 2018 calendar
Christmas 20173 months ago
John Lewis has unveiled the top 10 toys for Christmas 2017… and they could just break the bank
Celebrity3 months ago
Who is Nermina Pieters-Mekic? New star of Real Housewives of Cheshire and wife of Stoke City ace Erik
Bizarre2 months ago
Ex-Strictly stunner Ola Jordan sizzles in red swimsuit on holiday with husband James in Greece
Celebrity3 months ago
Who is Rachel Lugo? Real Housewives of Cheshire star and property pro – what you need to know
Health3 months ago
Women will cry six times a month on average – TWICE as much as men
Money3 months ago
We reveal our guide to organising a kids birthday bash without busting your budget — plus, get a free fiver from our rewards club